Certification, designed, not yet open
Future credential design
Criteria can be designed before enrollment exists
This page shows how a future Vecnine credential could be structured and what a person would have to demonstrate. Certification is not open yet, and nothing on this site currently grants a credential or professional status.
Boundary. No course completion, payment, private study, or self-description currently creates Vecnine certification.
Reading map
A design record, not an open credential
The design may change before launch. Enrollment, pricing, review capacity, rights, and timing have not been announced.
Boundary. No current page, course completion, or private study record grants certification. “Can calculate” never implies “should read another person.”
Enrollment is closed. No course completion, private study record, or payment currently confers a Vecnine credential. Launch, review capacity, price, and rights remain undecided founder-controlled matters.
Vecnine has designed its certification and this page describes it exactly. Enrollment is not open; nothing here collects anything. When it opens, it opens here first.
What it certifies, and refuses to
The certificate certifies method, never sight. A holder demonstrably knows the two levels of explanation and when each applies, the three honest tags and why open questions stay open, the claim limits, convergence as observation, never verdict, how the instruments compute and what they never do, and, above all, what Vecnine does not claim. It explicitly does not certify intuition, accuracy of readings, clinical competence, or predictive power, and a holder who sells verdicts is revocable on that ground alone. There will be a public revocation level from the first day; an empty level is still a level.
The three levels
Assessment, capacity, and honesty
Assessment is reviewed by Vecnine, which means capacity is a real constraint and cohorts will be small; the school says so rather than pretending scale. No certificate is sold as a product; pricing, cadence, and the opening itself are the rights-holder’s decisions and are not promised here. Path Six of the curriculum is the skeleton the whole design rides on, walking it now is the entire preparation.
Read the practitioner ethic
See how a fixed prompt can remain subordinate to consent and qualified judgment.
And one more line belongs in a practitioner’s ethics, because it is short enough to keep: can does not imply should. The method will let you compute anyone; the ethic is that ability is not permission. A reading is offered, never imposed, and some readings are not yours to give.